Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
”What’s 43 Folders?”
43Folders.com is Merlin Mann’s website about finding the time and attention to do your best creative work.
Why Are You Reading All That News?
Matt Wood | Dec 11 2007
When I wrote about my method for controlling RSS overload a couple weeks ago, 43 Folders user terceiro left a comment that put me in my place: You’re feeling stress about your RSS feeds? Talk about self-created problems. The real solution to managing RSS feeds is to stop reading RSS feeds. It’s simple ... when a purely optional “convenience” technology is causing stress, it’s time to re-evaluate at a pretty fundamental level. I read this and thrashed and spluttered like Yosemite Sam for a while before I admitted it: he's right. It is a self-created problem, and I need to understand what makes me feel the need to consume the equivalent of a Carnegie library every day, instead of just finding a more efficient way to choke it down. When I read discussions about managing RSS and information overload, I tend to see three justifications for why people "need" to subscribe to 842 news feeds:
After thinking about my own motivations and admitting that I've uttered all three of those at some point as well, my answer to every one would be, "Really?" Are you really going to miss that promotion if you didn't hear about the JDK update the second it was released? Are you really going to lose readers if you don't link to that third Boing Boing post? And are you really going to turn into a sheltered, mouth-breathing Epsilon if you happen to skip the news cycle one day? For me, it's always been a matter of identity. I like to view myself as an informed, plugged in, man of the digital world, and to be this person, I think I need to see all the latest news, comment on the hot blogs, post things on del.icio.us. That's all fine and dandy if that's the person I want to be, but within reason. I should know by now from experiences with other jobs, other vocations, and other vices, that if they start to cause me this kind of concern, something needs to change. "The world won't end without you knowing it. Trust me, your mom will call."
This isn't to say that we should all chuck our newsreaders and smash our TVs, but that we should, like terceiro said in that comment, keep a little perspective. In terms of those first two reasons above, we don't give ourselves enough credit for being the smart, inquisitive people that we are. Even if you shut down the RSS reader for a few days, you'll still know everything you need to know to do your job right. The fact that you possess such a powerful thirst for knowledge will cause you to absorb it passively wherever you go, from snatches of overheard conversations, TV, and radio. It will be enough until you have more time and energy to read it yourself. And the world won't end without you knowing it. Trust me, your mom will call. In regards to #3, we can also get a little full of ourselves at times. Despite wishful thinking, there aren't many bloggers who would be missed if they took a day off here and there. Take this site for instance; I bet you didn't even notice Merlin was gone. Unless it really is your job, you should probably pull up short when it starts to feel like one. Here's a suggestion: over the holidays when you're traveling, or when things are slow because everyone else is traveling, remove yourself from the news cycle for a few days and see if you don't shrivel up and die. Take long walks. Cancel something. And when you come back and open your newsreader again, hit that "Mark All as Read" button and start from scratch. I've started doing that 2-3 times a week now, and it feels glorious. 19 Comments
POSTED IN:
news is addictiveSubmitted by algal on December 13, 2007 - 4:48am.
In general, news -- a stream of pieces of information, chosen to be salient, updated regularly -- is literally addictive. I have never heard anyone comment on this directly but I think it's pretty clearly the case. It's very easy to get used to news. And when you get used to it, you want more of it and miss it when it stops. This applies not only to RSS feeds but also to political headlines, tabloid headlines, sports scores, plot developments in soap operas, etc.. For some reason, staying "up to date" is calming and comfortable, almost opiating. Maybe it's just a learned association, like a mental version of an animal always knowing where it's food bowl is. Really, I don't know why news so addictive. But I think you can see the compulsive, addictive aspect of people's news-reading when you reflect on how often the stuff they read is really totally irrelevant to their daily life and would also represent an exceedingly shallow and random way to explore a genuine interest. The idea of "staying informed" is just an excuse -- a widely and sincerely held excuse, but still an excuse. When the news topic is something important, like a presidential election, millions can become addicted to headlines, pat themselves on the back for their high-minded tastes, and never notice that in their analytical depth and emotional structure these headlines are in fact appealing to everyone as nothing more than a kind of soap opera. People are really there for the regular and mildly varied stimulation -- the "information" is beside the point. It can be fun to follow soap operas, and it makes you feel connected to other to know that they're following it too. But it's a pastime, not a virtue. » POSTED IN:
|
|
EXPLORE 43Folders | THE GOOD STUFF |