Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
”What’s 43 Folders?”
43Folders.com is Merlin Mann’s website about finding the time and attention to do your best creative work.
BumpTop: Nice for anything...but my Desktop
Merlin Mann | Jun 23 2006
BumpTop Prototype - HoneyBrown.ca Don't get me wrong -- like apparently everyone this week, I think the BumpTop demo is right purty. The little interface widgets are beautiful and functional, and the physics of the motion seem realistic. It looks lovely. But would I ever, in a million years, seek this out as a Desktop replacement? You bet your butt I wouldn't, and I'll tell you why (as well as what it would be great for). See, here's the thing: once your computer (and your related world, writ large) has excellent indexing, search, and access via something like Quicksilver, this kind of "physical" interface metaphor starts seeming quaint, if not downright exhausting. I guess I just never find myself shuffling and re-organizing large numbers of files in a way that isn't more than satisfactorily addressed with sorting, Smart Folders, icon views, and searching. I throw stuff into the most general piles I can stand, then let Quicksilver and Spotlight do all the heavy lifting. Maybe that's me, but this seems like a recipe for non-stop fiddling. Having said that I can imagine several situations where I'd personally want to toss items into piles and use functionality similar to BumpTop.
But as an interface to my file and folder system? Meh. The metaphor of personal computer as physical space has been strained beyond usefulness, in my opinion. It's the lack of physicality that affords such insane productivity for Quicksilver users. Everything is abstracted into nouns and verbs and I get to mash them up however I need to. I'm unconstrained by "here" and "there." Maybe I'm not who this would be targeted at, but I think I could be if it were applied to almost anything except my Desktop's contents. What do you think? 48 Comments
POSTED IN:
( sorry; accidentally submitted that) I...Submitted by Joan (not verified) on June 26, 2006 - 8:16am.
( sorry; accidentally submitted that) I had been going to say, why should we spend time extending the conceit rather than searching better ways of interacting with the non-physical digital world. We can pick up a magazine, carry it outside to the car, shove it in our pocket, etc. Our digital worlds are constrained to our computers' screens, regardless of our manipulation options (mouse, pen, etc.), so it doesn't make any sense to me to apply mechanical costumes to digital/mental manipulations. Outside of a game environment. I like my books for their physicality, and I like being able to use all my physical senses to perceive information from them/about them, but I value my digital world for its non-physicality and ease of access & fluid organizational options more in line with the flow of my thoughts, and able to change as quickly. » POSTED IN:
|
|
EXPLORE 43Folders | THE GOOD STUFF |