Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
”What’s 43 Folders?”
43Folders.com is Merlin Mann’s website about finding the time and attention to do your best creative work.
GUI - Grand Unified Interface
dp | Dec 5 2005
I'm on a quest for the Grand Unified Interface. I have a detailed hierarchy in the Finder, with a folder for each project, and each project folder parked in the appropriate Active, On Hold, etc. parent folder. A project folder can contain anything from text files, to OmniOutlines, to image files, to FileMaker databases. But the one thing it cannot contain is email. Currently, there is a duplicate project hierarchy in my mailbox list in Mail. During my weekly review, I spend a great deal of time syncing the project data in Mail with the project data in the Finder. I've tried saving copies of email messages into the appropriate project folders in the Finder, but must still keep the originals in Mail in order to facilitate ongoing conversation. I've tried keeping everything in Mail, but that's cumbersome. Email programs are not designed to be GTD managers. I've tried DevonThink, but it doesn't handle email very well, and requires me to launch FileMaker and OmniOutliner in order to work those files. If I'm going to launch independent apps, I might as well use the Finder. I'm looking for a Finder with a tightly integrated email capability. Has anyone run across this holy grail? dp 11 Comments
POSTED IN:
Unfortunately, that trick doesn't work...Submitted by dp on December 9, 2005 - 2:19pm.
civitan wrote: Unfortunately, that trick doesn't work for Mail.app. It works fine for *folders* of messages, though. But then you've still got to duplicate your folder structure in Mail.app. 1) isn't really going where I want to go. My system is so tightly structured that I do very little searching. 2) gets the mail into the project folder, but under cryptic names like "16938.emlx". Not very helpful. There hasn't been much response to this thread. So the answer to 3) seems to be that only one person is really interested in it, and he's not really able to define what he needs with much precision. » POSTED IN:
|
|
EXPLORE 43Folders | THE GOOD STUFF |