Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
”What’s 43 Folders?”
43Folders.com is Merlin Mann’s website about finding the time and attention to do your best creative work.
Question about the future...
mdl | Sep 1 2006
I love lofi technologies, not least because they limit the time I spend at the computer. (When you don't have a computer in front of you, what can you do but read, think, write, cook, eat, see friends, go places, walk, run, and observe the real world?) Though I have a cell phone, I do as much work as I can on index cards. This even includes drafting important emails, which I can then type when I get to a computer. Let me ask a cranky question (one that belies my actual youthful appearance): Is the time coming (say, within five years) when it will be obligatory for all workers to have smartphones or pocket computers? Will this become the social norm in the same way that life without a telephone became all but unthinkable by the middle of the twentieth century? When I see friends who are addicted to their Blackberries and Treos, I get upset, because I feel that they are allowing an incursion into their personal space that is optional now, but may someday become obligatory. (Don't you love it when someone pulls out a Blackberry and checks email while you're having a conversation with him/her?) The most eager and competitive workers will be willing to make themselves available to their companies 24 hours a day. Managers will expect responsiveness to email all the time. (In some areas, this has already happened.) I already see this behavior in many of my acquaintances. I understand it when they are lawyers and managers. But I also see the behavior in some traditional 8-5 office workers, which bothers me, since they're not getting paid enough to merit ceding their private space to their companies. This may be the wrong place to ask this question, since some of the readers here may be gung-ho, do anything, 24 hour, workaholic, sell my soul to the market, globalized techies. Not to be a luddite or anything, but I'm hoping that paper will serve as a boundary between myself and the insane pace of today's connected world. Of course, in Darwinian style, I may very well perish by the wayside. But won't we all in the end anyway? Might as well go out in style, entrusting my memory to the universal and elegant technology of paper than to some clunky, dead-end pocket computer platform. 4 Comments
POSTED IN:
Daniel, Thanks for your eloquent reply...Submitted by mdl on September 2, 2006 - 7:53am.
Daniel, Thanks for your eloquent reply to my somewhat curmudgeonly post. I suppose I am an unapologetic modernist. I think that the combination of paper and printing press created, for a time, the most literate period the West has ever seen (1775-ca. 1950). For better or for worse, we are losing the very sophisticated literate culture that developed during that period. Print, I believe, allowed for a felicitous balance between speed and seriousness. News moved just fast enough for individuals to keep abreast of current events. But it moved slowly enough for readers and writers to reflect seriously on those events. There was time to think before things were put into print. (Unlike this post, which is hastily written and will now shamelessly rely on visual shorthand to demonstrate its good intentions.) :) Henry David Thoreau says it much more beautifully than I ever could: "Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. They are but improved means to an unimproved end, an end which it was already but too easy to arrive at; as railroads lead to Boston or New York. We are in great haste to construct a magnetic telegraph from Maine to Texas; but Maine and Texas, it may be, have nothing important to communicate... As if the main object were to talk fast and not to talk sensibly... After all, the man whose horse trots a mile in a minute does not carry the most important messages." Capitalism makes rapid change inevitable. But I also want to believe that resistance is not simple conservatism. Anyway, thanks so much for the thoughtful reply. Matt » POSTED IN:
|
|
EXPLORE 43Folders | THE GOOD STUFF |