Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
”What’s 43 Folders?”
43Folders.com is Merlin Mann’s website about finding the time and attention to do your best creative work.
NYT: New data on the problems of "multitasking"
Merlin Mann | Mar 26 2007
Slow Down, Multitaskers, and Don’t Read in Traffic - New York Times Yesterday's New York Times front page ran an article pulling together the results of several recent studies looking at how interruptions and attempts to multitask can affect the quality of work as well as the length of recovery time. Here's one bit that really grabbed me:
And, from a PDF of another of the studies cited ("Isolation of a Central Bottleneck of Information Processing with Time-Resolved fMRI"), here's a telling snippet from the article's abstract (yes, most of the rest of it is well over my head):
My own feelings on the myth of multi-tasking are well-documented, but it's fascinating to see research interest focused in this area -- although it's certainly not surprising, given its potential impact on knowledge workers and the industries that employ them. Again, from yesterday's NYT article:
36 Comments
POSTED IN:
I'm not usually one to...Submitted by Josh R. Holloway (not verified) on March 26, 2007 - 7:31am.
I'm not usually one to dispute clearly observable scientific studies, but there are two things that those studies vastly overlook. Read on... The first study you mentioned talked about Microsoft employees, and stated that they looked at only people over 18 for the study. What about the kids, eh? The group blog I write for consists mostly of writers under 18. I talk to them on Skype all the time, and I know based on their habits that they multitask often, and they do it very well. I'm not disputing that one task means 100% of your brain focusing on that task, but I think looking at it like using 20% of your brain split between two tasks is a huge fallacy. Second, I don't see based on what I read that either of the studies determined if we could be taught to multitask better. I think this goes back to the idea about kids - as they (well, I suppose at 19 I could be included as well) grow up in an increasingly connected and wired world, they have things flying at them from all different corners of life, and they have to learn to deal with that. If you've ever read Charles Stross' excellent novel Accelerando, you might understand what I'm talking about as a "Manfred Macx moment" where you've got ten or twenty "feeds" of things constantly shooting stuff in your direction that you have to deal with like a goalie defending a net. After going through about a year of managing a huge list of RSS feeds, email, web sites, and more, and now adding things like Twitter into the mix, there is barely any way to avoid multitasking. I believe based on these kinds of hectic situations, though, that we can learn how to manage them better. Again, I'm not disputing that it's often better to focus all of your brainpower on one task at any given time, but I really do believe that we, especially younger people growing up in this singularity-imminent world of ours, can multitask a lot better than some scientific study says we can. There's too much about our brains that we don't yet understand to be able to encompass something like this in a single study. » POSTED IN:
|
|
EXPLORE 43Folders | THE GOOD STUFF |