Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
”What’s 43 Folders?”
43Folders.com is Merlin Mann’s website about finding the time and attention to do your best creative work.
Dr. Contextlove or: "How I learned to stop worrying and love iCal"
Merlin Mann | Feb 27 2006
A favorite topic of GTD'ers is the contexts that we each choose to identify the times, tools, or locations by which a given task can or must be undertaken. This is a highly personalized decision, and I've learned a lot from seeing how other people are doing it. Since I see it's been a while since I've talked about how I'm using contexts, here's an update that reflects how I'm now using Kinkless GTD and iCal to keep things wrangled. Contexts, enumeratedIt's worth mentioning that a lot of my approach has been shaped by my move from Entourage to kGTD + iCal. While the actual contexts haven't changed too much, the way I organize and think about them has evolved, as we'll see a bit later. The context themselves, with a brief explanation, where it's useful or non-obvious: Actionable contexts
Unactionable or deferred contexts(Note: the "+" sign tells kGTD that these contexts don't generate next actions or iCal syncs)
So, that's a snapshot of where I am now. A number of those contexts are "on the bubble" right now -- too cute or fussy or potentially procrastinatable (is that even a word?). I comb through contexts in general every few weeks, or more often when one of them seems to have become an oubliette for the items I want to banish from thought. That's a good sign that the context is not about action at all and should be removed or refactored immediately. iCal GroupsAnd now: the sexy. iCal sucks in a lot of ways (that's for another post), but it does do one thing I love: it let's you put your separate "calendars" -- which, in our case, are the actionable contexts we've synced from kGTD -- into "groups." I'm using this to make three "meta-contexts" that mirror the very general types of work into which all my tasks (and their parent contexts) belong.
But why bother with organizing these into meta-groups? Ah, because it makes it so easy to reveal or hide all the tasks that I can work on at a given time, just by ticking the group's little click box. This makes having many contexts so much more manageable. So, if you're keeping score, here's how they break out in iCal
Which gets me to the secret point of this post. It's the basic kGTD approach that's been really useful to me:
This has the effect of keeping you really focused on the doing rather than the fiddling. Once you've got kGTD set up to a point where you trust it to mind your world, try living in iCal instead. For one thing it's a lot less engrossing to play with, which might send you back to work more quickly than the amusement park ride that kGTD can be. You end up with a shorthand way to mentally gauge your "doing-to-fiddling ratio"; If you find you are spending a lot more time in kGTD than iCal you know it's time to ramp up the working and dial down the fussy meta work. 39 Comments
POSTED IN:
This is brilliant. I've...Submitted by brendon (not verified) on February 27, 2006 - 6:52am.
This is brilliant. I've been struggling with what stuff I have sync to iCal, and why, and how I use it. This is definitely worth looking into. RIGHT NOW, I just sync my errands, calls, and "anywhere" contexts into a "contexts" group, primarily so that, in turn, they sync to my bluetooth phone (SE T637) and I can have them when I'm on the go and those are the main things I can do. But I DO find that when I'm trying to tick stuff off in KGTD, I often get involved in syncing to update the display, reworking the projects, or getting stuff out of the inbox and into the projects, instead of staying in the "action framework". Obviously, this is partially a personal discipline problem, but then again, isn't it all? But another big reason for this is that while I LIKE having some of the smaller, more specific contexts (ie sometimes i LIKE to stay in my "code" list while I have bbEdit and svnx open), that not having access to a SLIGHTLY wider context (design tasks that go with the code tasks, comps that need to go somewhere, etc.) is what makes me not "trust the context", and go back to project view to see what "semi-related" tasks I'm missing JUST outside the current context. This is where your "groups" plan really makes a LOT of sense to me. AND, having iCal as my main framework for action definitely should help the discipline issue, as you've mentioned. Do you then still have another group (or two) for hard landscape items in iCal? Right now, I have 2 groups - one of items that are distinctly "MINE" (gigs, holidays, lessons I'm teaching, meetings, and appointments) broken down into a few separate calendars, and another group for OTHERS schedules that define my hard landscape and schedule planning (one for my GF, one for my roommate, one that covers my student's big conflicts, one for when coworkers and my boss are out of town or otherwise unavailable, etc.) Seems to work ok, and I can turn off other people's input in one click. As always, Thanks for sharing your approach! » POSTED IN:
|
|
EXPLORE 43Folders | THE GOOD STUFF |