Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
Merlin’s weekly podcast with Dan Benjamin. We talk about creativity, independence, and making things you love.
”What’s 43 Folders?”
43Folders.com is Merlin Mann’s website about finding the time and attention to do your best creative work.
Kendall Clark: AlphaSmart Neo's interesting for what it's _not_
Merlin Mann | Sep 21 2005
On the Joys of Primitive Computing: The AlphaSmart Neo I keep hearing rumblings about the AlphaSmart Neo, but haven’t put my hands to one yet. Anybody out there got one? Tried one? Seems a bit steep at $250, but I’d love to play with one Kendall Clark seems to think Neo’s part of a larger trend:
And no internet. Some days, I believe I’d find that pretty appealing. 19 Comments
POSTED IN:
Ok, first thing to note...Submitted by Rob Donoghue (not verified) on September 21, 2005 - 11:10am.
Ok, first thing to note is that alphasmart's products are mostly designed with education in mind. You're paying for durability and battery life more than functionality and, sadly, you are paying a bit too much. A few years back, I got myself an Alphasmart Dana, which is the somewhat more powerful version of the Neo - similar form factor, but running an older version of the Palm OS, modified to use the widescreen. End result was that you could do some fairly powerful word processing without worrying too much about the device. I can attest to it's physical durability - it will casually survive drops of a few feet, and its battery life, which is phenomenal. What's more, it was full of smart design decisions. The KB felt pretty solid. The built in battery was the same size and shape as 6 AAs so you could swap it out as needed. Unfortunately, for all those benefits, it's something that fell by the wayside for kind of sad reasons. First, the display is simply not that hot. Think Palm V sort of LCD and you've got the right idea. While the font and size controls helped address this to some extent, it never really overcame the fact that the screen was basically short and narrow (Doubly bad since that's the reverse of what is most comfortable for people to read). The form factor was great for typing and use, but awkward for transportation. The upcurve of the screen meant it sat awkwardly in any bag, and would frequently get turned on accidentally, and while the battery life was good, nothing could take that kind of abuse. Did I mention it was also expensive? About $500 at the time. I justified it thinking that the distractions of a laptop would be counterproductive, and I just wanted something simple, and I ended up with serious gadget remorse. In the end, it was too much to pay for what was a single-use tool. Ironically, what I ended up replacing it with were these neat notebooks I found at a small bookstore, Moleskines or some such. ;) I actually tried to break it out again recently, specifically to contrast to my experience writing on laptops of a variety of sizes and oh sweet god, it felt limiting. The instant on is nice, but not when it's Dig out of my bag, instant on, open up a new tab, type something, peer at it, save it to be safe, then put it away again. For that, paper or a convenient handheld is going to do much much, much better. Now, lest I imply it's all bad, I do have to admit that it may be the single best note-taking tool I've seen short of a full-on tablet PC, so I think it is still very well suited to its intended purpose (students) but not so much beyond that. » POSTED IN:
|
|
EXPLORE 43Folders | THE GOOD STUFF |